By: CropLife International
School would have been a lot more fun if the tests were on the world’s favorite dessert. Take this quiz to see how much you really know about the science behind chocolate.
By: CropLife International
School would have been a lot more fun if the tests were on the world’s favorite dessert. Take this quiz to see how much you really know about the science behind chocolate.
By: CropLife International
By: CropLife International
Last year we continued showcasing the good work done by farmers and plant scientists through our #FoodHeroes campaign. Originally launched in 2016 with 40 inspirational people, the campaign continued to grow throughout 2017. Today there are almost 100 Food Hero profiles online, each one explaining what motivates them and how their work helps bring food to our tables.
This month we’re featuring ten of the most popular Food Heroes from 2017.
![]() Ramanathan Sowdhamini is a professor at the National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India. She comes from a chemistry background and was trained as a structural bioinformatician, with a focus on protein structure prediction and similarities among proteins. |
![]() Esther Ngumbi is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology in Alabama, United States. Her experience with farming growing up inspired her to pursue a career that would allow her to find solutions to the challenges farmers around the world face today. She loves her work and believes she has the “best job in the world!” |
![]() Dusty Zamecnik is a fourth-generation farmer at EZ Grow Farms in Norfolk County, Ontario, Canada. He graduated in 2013 from St. Francis Xavier University with a Bachelor of Business Administration, and is the Young Farmer Representative for the Ontario Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association. |
![]() Alina Cretu is a Romanian maize, sunflower and wheat farmer and Director of the Romanian Maize Growers Organization. |
![]() I love growing sugarcane because it’s such a major source of food and energy. But I can lose up to 10 percent in productivity and 5 percent in sugarcane quality to the borer.” Sugarcane farmer Evandro Piedade Do Amaral, who started his farm at the age of 25, enjoys growing sugarcane, but gets disheartened by insect infestations. |
![]() Gabriela Luciani is a plant scientist for Monsanto. She developed biotech soybeans that are resistant to caterpillars. Today around a third of Argentine farmers are using her insect-resistant variety. |
![]() Remmy Mainga is a technical sales manager in Lusaka, Zambia. He helps emerging growers move from small scale, subsistence farming to larger commercial operations. |
![]() Sophien Kamoun is a plant scientist at The Sainsbury Laboratory in Norwich, United Kingdom. Passionate about plant pathogens, he works primarily on blight and blast diseases. |
![]() Dr. Virginie Mfegue is the Cocoa Swollen Shoot Virus (CSSV) Program Manager in West Africa at the World Cocoa Foundation. She is in charge of leading a multicomponent research and development program aimed at developing tools for the control of CSSV and the protection of cocoa farms. |
![]() Sudhindra is a mixed farmer from the remote village of Jevargi, Kalaburagi district, India. He grows Bt cotton, wheat, pigeon peas, rice chickpea and jowar (sorghum). |
Would you like to submit a Food Hero? It’s not too late, please keep sending them in your #FoodHeroes here.
View the #FoodHeroes:
By: CropLife International
As we kick off 2018, we want to make sure that you’re equipped with the most up to date information on plant science in sustainable agriculture. So we have created a list of the most influential studies published over the last 12 months. Take a look to make sure you didn’t miss any!
Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2016, by James C
The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) released its annual global biotech crop acreage report, which features data on the environmental and socio-economic benefits of plant biotech. ISAAA reported that the adoption of biotech crops has reduced CO2 emissions; conserved biodiversity by removing 19.4 million hectares of land from agriculture in 2015; and decreased the environmental impact of agriculture with a 19% reduction in herbicide and insecticide applications. Additionally, in developing countries, planting biotech crops has helped alleviate hunger by increasing the incomes for 18 million small farmers and their families, bringing improved financial stability to more than 65 million people.
Download the report or read our summary
Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments for Glyphosate, by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
The safety of the popular herbicide glyphosate was a hot topic in 2017. Many in the plant science industry feared that the politically-motivated calls to remove glyphosate from the market would set a worrying precedent for crop protection products globally. In December the US Environmental Protection Agency published draft risk assessments that concluded glyphosate is unlikely to be carcinogenic to humans, and when used correctly poses no other meaningful risks to human health. The assessments will be open for public comment for 60 days later this year.
Download the risk assessments or read the press release
Human cost burden of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals. A critical review, by Bond G, Dietrich D
German researchers carried out a review of recent studies on the economic cost of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). The review published in the Archives of Toxicology found “substantial flaws” in the methodology of these studies. They concluded that the assigned costs are “highly speculative” and recommended against their use in deciding regulation.
Taking Distrust of Science Seriously, by Kabat G
As science and technology continue to evolve at extraordinary rates, understanding of technological progress hasn’t always been able to keep up, leading to confusion around controversial issues like EDCs, GMOs and pesticides, according to this study. Writing in EMBO Reports, Albert Einstein College of Medicine’s Geoffrey Kabat claims to overcome public distrust, scientists need to stop pretending there is scientific consensus on these issues.
GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2015, by Brookes G, Barfoot P
The 12th annual report on the global economic and environmental impact of genetically modified (GM) crops shares the benefits that so many farmers worldwide have gained from planting biotech crops. The report shares the economic and environmental benefits that farmers all over the world have received since biotech crops were first commercialized over 20 years ago.
In October the Republican chairmen of the US House Committee on Science and the Subcommittee on Environment sent a letter to the director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Chris Wild to say they were “concerned about the scientific integrity” of IARC’s monograph program, which assesses whether various substances can cause cancer in people. They listed their concerns and invited Mr Wild to testify to their committees.
Society of Toxicology – Food and Feed Safety of Genetically Engineered Food Crops
While countless scientific studies have demonstrated that foods obtained from genetically engineered (GE) crops are as safe and nutritious as foods obtained from conventional crops, questions still remain about the safety of these products. The Society of Toxicology Issue Statement provides a brief overview of the research processes and principles used to assess the safety of GE crops.
The issue statement coincided with the publication of the article below, both addressing the same topic and sharing a title.
Food and Feed Safety of Genetically Engineered Food Crops, by Delaney B, Goodman RE, Ladics GS
This article reviews the safety information regarding Genetically Engineered (GE) crops and foods, by evaluating over 20 years of research in genetic engineering. Like the issue statement, it is based on the premise that although new GE crops are assessed by regulatory authorities prior to approval for commercial use, there is still a public debate on the safety GE crops.
Three years of banning neonicotinoid insecticides based on sub-lethal effects: can we expect to see effects on bees? By Blacquière T, van der Steen J
A Wageningen University literature review questions the link between pollinator decline and neonicotinoid (neonics) use, suggesting that honeybee colony losses were instead due to pests, parasites and bad beekeeping practices. It is too early to tell what effect the 2013 ban on use of neonics has had on pollinators, however, the authors concluded that it does offer the possibility to collect more data to supply future debate with accurate information.
Quantitative Weight of Evidence Assessment of Effects of Three Neonicotinoids on Honeybee Colonies, by Solomon K, Stephenson G
An analysis by University of Guelph’s scientists found that three of the most popular neonics are safe for honeybee colonies when used properly. Their research, published in the Journal of Toxicology, is spread across five papers, and analyses over 60 peer-reviewed papers, as well as 170 unpublished industry studies submitted to regulatory agencies.
Download the reports or read the press release
You can also view our top 10 studies for 2016, 2015 and 2014.
By: CropLife International
As you enjoy festive foods this holiday season, give thanks to agriculture and plant science by sharing these graphic quotes:
By: CropLife International
Learn about “12 holiday dishes” around the world and how plant science helps make them available:
By: CropLife International
This year saw the launch of the documentary Food Evolution about the genetic modification of food, directed by Academy Award-nominated Scott Hamilton Kennedy. Traveling from Hawaiian papaya groves, to banana farms in Uganda to the cornfields of Iowa, the film, narrated by esteemed science communicator Neil deGrasse Tyson, wrestles with the emotions and the science driving one of the most heated arguments of our time.
The New York Times said of it: “The film draws strongly on viewers’ emotions but it doesn’t skimp on science. Marrying incisive explanations of the scientific nitty-gritty of agriculture and plant breeding with compelling discussion of why people seem wired to trust gut feelings over facts, Food Evolution adds crucial psychological, social, and moral context, without which discourse on the subject often devolves to fruitless blows.”
You can watch the trailer and download the film here.
By: CropLife International
In honor of World Food Day Oct. 16, this month is the perfect time to recognize the World Food Prize founder and some of the laureates who were pioneers in plant breeding and sustainable food production. Tweet us @CropLifeIntl and let us know who would be on your list!
Who: Dr. Norman E. Borlaug, plant scientist from the United States, known as the “father of the Green Revolution.”
Innovation: Developed successive generations of wheat varieties with broad and stable disease resistance that were adaptable to a wide range of growing conditions with exceedingly high yield potential.
Impact: The new wheat varieties, alongside improved crop management practices, transformed agricultural production in Mexico during the 1940s and 1950s and later in Asia and Latin America. The increased production helped combat hunger and famine, crediting Borlaug with saving “more lives than any other person who has ever lived.”
Recognition: Borlaug received the Nobel Peace Prize for a lifetime of work to feed a hungry world. As founder of the World Food Prize, he in turn recognized agricultural research and technologies to convince leaders to support them.
Who: Dr. Monkombu Sambasivan Swaminathan, plant scientist from India.
Innovation: He worked with Borlaug to develop higher yielding wheat varieties with stalk structures strong enough to support their increased biomass. The first year’s harvest alone tripled previous production levels. Swaminathan also taught Indian farmers how to effectively increase production by using fertilizers and more efficient farming techniques.
Impact: Swaminathan’s efforts transformed India from a “begging bowl” to a “breadbasket” almost overnight, bringing the total wheat crop from 12 million to 23 million tons in four crop seasons and ending India’s reliance on imports. He later worked with former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to establish agricultural policies and programs to enhance long-term self-sufficiency.
Recognition: Swaminathan received the first World Food Prize in 1987 for improving Indian agriculture.
Who: Drs. Ray F. Smith and Perry L. Adkisson, agronomists from the United States.
Innovation: Developed and popularized Integrated Pest Management (IPM) – the best combination of cultural, biological and chemical measures to manage diseases, insects, weeds and other crop pests. Seeking to reduce reliance on crop protection products alone, Smith and Adkisson worked both independently and together to demonstrate the value of IPM programs.
Impact: U.S. government statistics estimate that American farmers’ need for insecticides dropped by 50 percent as they adopted an IPM approach to managing pests. Over 75 percent of U.S. farmers use IPM systems today. The United Nations estimates that over 1 million farmers in more than 60,000 villages in every region of the world have applied IPM methods with increased production in some cases.
Recognition: Smith and Adkisson shared the 1997 World Food Prize for developing and popularizing IPM.
Who: Dr. Monty Jones of Sierra Leone and Dr. Yuan Longping of China.
Innovation: These two rice scientists independently made breakthroughs in breeding rice. Jones created a rice variety bred for conditions in Africa with the ability to resist weeds, survive droughts and thrive in poor soils – a crop capable of increasing farmers’ harvests by 25 to 250 percent. Longping is known as the “father of hybrid rice,” the first scientist to successfully alter the self-pollinating characteristics of rice to allow for large-scale hybrid rice production.
Impact: Jones’ rice benefits 20 million farmers and 240 million consumers in West Africa alone. Longping’s discovery increased rice yields by 20 percent, feeding about 70 million more people annually. His research institute has trained over 3,000 scientists from more than 50 countries, inspiring hybrid rice production around the world.
Recognition: Jones and Longping won the 2004 World Food Prize during the International Year of Rice declared by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Who: Three plant scientists — Dr. Marc Van Montagu of Belgium and Drs. Mary-Dell Chiltonand Robert T. Fraley of the United States.
Innovation: They independently pioneered research on the successful transfer of bacterial genes into plants, creating the world’s first biotech crops with improved yields, resistance to insects and diseases, and tolerance to herbicides and extreme climatic conditions. Van Montagu founded two biotechnology companies which pioneered work on insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant crops. Chilton established one of the first industrial agricultural biotechnology programs, leading research on disease and insect resistance and improving transformation systems in crops. At Monsanto Company, Fraley led the genetic modification of several crops to be resistant to insect and weed pests as well as tolerant to the herbicide glyphosate and climatic stress, such as excessive heat and drought.
Impact: Since biotech crops were introduced in 1996, 18 million farmers in 26 countries have planted 185 million hectares, generating $150 billion USD in additional farm income.
Recognition: Van Montagu, Chilton and Fraley shared the 2013 World Food Prize for their breakthroughs in founding, developing and applying modern biotechnology to crops.
Who: Sir Fazle Hasan Abed, development pioneer from Bangladesh.
Innovation: Developed BRAC (formerly the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee), which many claim to be the most effective anti-poverty organization in the world. The objectives of BRAC’s agriculture and food security program have been to increase crop and livestock production while ensuring environmental sustainability, adaptability to climate change, and affordability for marginal and small farmers. Essential to this approach is ensuring that improved inputs and technologies are taken to the poor farmers—and that the experience of the farmers is brought back to the laboratories—in a continual cycle of innovation.
Impact: BRAC has helped nearly 150 million people worldwide, especially women, improve their lives, enhance food security and move out of poverty. It has also helped more than 500,000 farmers gain access to efficient farming techniques, technologies, training and financial support services, significantly increasing yields.
Recognition: Abed was honored as the 2015 World Food Prize laureate for developing BRAC
Learn more about World Food Prize laureates at WorldFoodPrize.org.
The World Food Prize, known to some as the Oscars of agriculture, is awarded annually to one or more individuals who have made a great achievement in furthering sustainable agriculture and global food security. Ambassador Kenneth Quinn, president of the World Food Prize Foundation, tells us more.
What inspired you to take the position of president of the World Food Prize after such an illustrious career in the foreign service?
Ironically, I had no contact with agriculture and no interest in it at the outset of my career. When I joined the U.S. foreign service in 1967, I thought I’d be going to fancy places like London, Paris and Brussels but instead, I was sent to Vietnam to do rural development and I was out working in villages when the Green Revolution began. Norman Borlaug was bringing his miracle wheat to Mexico at that time and I saw high-yielding rice that could grow in half the time come to Vietnam. It transformed the lives of people in one or two growing seasons.
When I finished in 1999 as ambassador in Cambodia, I was approached to take over the World Food Prize and I finally met Borlaug. I thought he’d think I was some fancy pants diplomat but when I explained the importance of infrastructure to rural development, Borlaug pounded his fist on the table in agreement and screamed “roads!” He said that if you don’t have roads, you might as well not have the food. After that, we worked together to grow the World Food Prize.
How does it feel to encourage excellence in agricultural production around the world?
It feels marvelous to be able to hold up Borlaug’s legacy and continue his work, harnessing the power of science to uplift farmers, especially smallholder farmers. Borlaug wondered if the Green Revolution would hit Africa and it is great that this year’s winner is from there. Actually, we now have six World Food Prize laureates from Africa as the World Food Prize is helping fulfill the goal Borlaug had of inspiring leaders in countries across the continent
How has the World Food Prize contributed to agricultural improvement?
At its most basic, this annual prize of $250,000 recognizes and inspires individuals who have improve the quality, quantity and availability of food to reduce hunger and malnutrition. We also organize an annual symposium called the Borlaug Dialogue to highlight key issues facing global agriculture and food security. It regularly draws over 1,000 people from about 60 countries. Bill Gates launched his Africa project from the World Food Prize stage and Indra
Nooyi, CEO of Pepsico, launched her company’s global nutrition challenge. Tony Blair and Kofi Annan are other examples of headliners.
The Global Youth Institute is our third project. We recruit 15- to 17-year-old students from nine countries to rub shoulders with ministers of agriculture and present papers with solutions to agricultural challenges. Most are urban high school students with no background in agriculture or farming and about two-thirds are women. They are interested in the environment, biotechnology, climate volatility and gender equity – all of which fall under rural and agricultural development. We have 200 students per symposium, 24 of which are sent to leading agricultural research centers around world for internships. They come back transformed and inspired to deal with issues of food security, human nutrition and making the world better
What are the common values or characteristics of World Food Prize laureates?
As part of the World Food Prize process for the past 18 years, I have the great privilege of calling up the winners or telling them face to face that they’ve won. In each case, it takes their breath away. They are taken with this honor. The laureates are characterized by humility and dedication. Every one of them has put in extra effort somewhere, overcome a hurdle or taken an arduous path at times – such as blocks in research – and yet with perseverance, they never gave up. Many of the living laureates come to the World Food Prize each year. They are the all-star team of food production and hunger reduction in all of human history.
Which agricultural technologies and practices have the greatest potential to enhance future food production and security?
Can we produce enough nutritious food in a sustainable way and can we do so in face of climate volatility, droughts and floods that smallholder farmers must face? The debate of biotechnology is over. “Science is the multiplier of the harvest,” says a National Academy of Sciences building in Washington, D.C. The World Food Prize was presented in 2013 to biotech pioneers. Smallholder farmers, namely women, who are barely able to have a sustainable harvest, need every possible asset on their side. Crop surpluses will uplift their lives and feed more people. Opponents of biotechnology have to answer the question: Am I going to deny this asset to those smallholder farmers? I don’t believe you can in good conscience. They should have the best technology available to them to combat flooding, etc. It’s a race of science and agricultural research to combat these difficult challenges.
Precision agriculture, satellites and cell phones are also important so farmers know when to plant and what to do. Same with CRISPR technology and gene editing. The next Borlaug Dialogue will be a CRIPSR panel talking about the challenge of change in research and the importance of agricultural and medical research scientists collaborating more. We need to take lessons from one discipline to another.
Synthetic biology will also be part of our future. That’s where you can replicate living things digitally and transmit them via the Internet. For example, if there is a pig disease outbreak outside of the U.S., quarantined pig parts can be transmitted digitally to U.S. labs so scientists here can develop vaccines and send the formulas digitally back to where the outbreak took place.
The final area with enormous potential is biofortification – improving the nutritional composition of crops like vegetables and grains – which can be done with traditional plant breeding or genetic modification.
We’ve come a long way in agriculture. How much further can we go?
In the World Food Prize Hall of Laureates, we have a history of human agriculture of 10,000 years – from the first seed in Mesopotamia to the 20th century when breakthroughs came at
the most amazing rate. But it’s clear, as in medicine, that more is certainly possible. Spreading technology and the road out of poverty is the theme of the World Food Prize this year because roads are key to spreading technology; nutrition, science and better seeds.
Do we have the resources to take agricultural research to the next level
Borlaug lamented underfunded public agricultural research. If we don’t put money into agricultural research, we will not have the tools necessary to meet greatest challenge humanity has ever faced. Investing in agricultural research at the state and national levels is one of very best ways of creating more jobs and stimulating breakthrough achievements that need to be developed. We’ve created the greatest system of agricultural research that’s ever existed, but will we use it to its fullest capacity, especially in the developing world where the most food insecure people live?
Visit the World Food Prize website to find out more about the Borlaug Dialogues this year 18-20 October. Follow it online using #FoodPrize17